Hello guys, in case you want to test it, there is a new Linux enumeration tool in the block :). It tries to gradualy show the most important information for a privesc instead of just dumping a lot of information that in many cases is not useful.
Looks great! I really like the different verbose levels. I have an idea that would be cool to see added. If after running say the default verbose level, It would be cool if you could expand or re-run a particular section or sections with a deeper verbose level. For example,
Looks great! I really like the different verbose levels. I have an idea that would be cool to see added. If after running say the default verbose level, It would be cool if you could expand or re-run a particular section or sections with a deeper verbose level. For example,
@0xd1360b said:
Thanks a lot for the suggestion, I will look into it. If you could also open a ticket on github it would help me to remember to work on it.
@0xd1360b said:
Thanks a lot for the suggestion, I will look into it. If you could also open a ticket on github it would help me to remember to work on it.
I tested it on a HtB machine and lse.sh just showed the right way, as it has blinking arrows hahaha.
Cheers and congratulations!
I am glad that it was helpful. Which box was it? Out of curiosity
Hi there,
I will avoid any spoils here, but i can say that was a lightweight machine hahaha
In fact, LinEnum shows the same results, but lse.sh gave the proper spotlight over the right way to privesc there.
I strongly suggest everyone to try it out.
Cheers
Ahhh, I did that one :D. Yeah, the tool tries to do that: focus on the important information instead of just dumping a ton of it for you to do the filtering.
@0xd1360b said:
Thanks a lot for the suggestion, I will look into it. If you could also open a ticket on github it would help me to remember to work on it.
Issue sent!
The functionality was implemented together with some improvements
However I am a bit worried that you required -l2 to see the important stuff. Are you sure it was -l2 and not -l1 ? If it was -l2, could you PM me telling me what information was in -l2 that you needed for exploitation? Maybe it must me moved to -l1.